16gb vs 32gb ram logic pro x free
Oct 06, · RAM: CRUCIAL 64GB DDR ECC RDIMMs HDD: WD RED 3TBx8 SSD: 4 xSamsung EVO Basic (GB, “) – – VMs/Jails HBA: LSI i OS: 1 x Kingston UV GB SSD – boot drive PSU: Corsair RM Version: TrueNAS CORE FANS: 3xFractal R3 mm – 3 Front, 1 Rear. Corsair Commander Pro to control the fans (see script . Laptop MSI GE66 RAIDER 10SGS, Intel Core iH GHz, RAM 32GB, Sólido SSD 1TB PCIe, Video 8 GB Nvidia RTX SUPER Max-Q, LED ” Full HD a Laptop MSI GE66 RAIDER 10SGS, Intel Core iH GHz, RAM 32GB, Sólido SSD 1TB PCIe, Vid. Testing conducted by Apple in September using preproduction inch MacBook Pro systems with Apple M1 Max, core CPU, and 64GB of RAM, and preproduction inch MacBook Pro systems with Apple M1 Pro, core CPU, and 32GB of RAM, both configured with 8TB SSD, as well as production GHz quad-core Intel Core i7-based inch MacBook .
16gb vs 32gb ram logic pro x free.High End CPUs – Intel vs AMD
Joined Jan 4, Messages 1, JOduMonT Dabbler. Joined Jan 27, Messages Last edited: Oct 6, Joined Jan 1, Messages 6, You were nearly there Thank you I eventually figured it out You must log in or register to reply here. Similar threads N. Replies 16 Views 3K. May 19, mav. Locked Best course of action with additiobal drives. Replies 20 Views 2K. Aug 12, david kennedy. Can’t delete a sparsebundle. Phil Demand Jan 17, Storage.
Replies 8 Views 2K. Apr 28, tdscrna. Locked – how can I recover deleted data, after zfs destroy -r. HowCast Nov 18, Storage. Replies 2 Views Nov 19, HowCast. Locked datasets vs volumes. Randall Roth Nov 6, Storage. Replies 1 Views Nov 6, Randall Roth. Yes, probably. Two points though: 1. I have very rarely swapped on my 16Gb M1 Air, and when I did I only noticed later when looking back at graphs.
I’m sure there was a performance hit but I never felt it. I do plenty of actual, professional use on my 16Gb M1 Air. A few minutes ago I also had Slack open on it. I regularly start iTerm to do terminal tasks. You must have an Intel machine. I had a powerful fully specced 32Gb i9 16″ MBP. This cheap and humble 16Gb passively cooled M1 blows it right out of the water in every single aspect.
It’s even better at running Intel Docker images! I run an 8GB M1 and rarely hit the wall, and I use mine much like you describe using yours. And I don’t seem to ever need even close to 16GB, much less “way north”, or even saw it be slow. Maybe it’s time to come over to M1 and Citrix will still need to buffer the same compressed? There’s nothing magical there You’re at least somewhat correct.
I’m now playing a 4K movie on Plex. It’s using a little over 1Gb RAM for that. Firefox is still snappy. Safari is still running normally. VS Code is still doing its thing. Mail still runs fine, sends and receives, and I can switch between mail accounts and messages. So, you may be technically right about the memory usage and the need for swapping. What you’re missing is the fact that it doesn’t hurt the user experience.
This is not marketing or bamboozlement. This is me on the same laptop I’m typing this answer. You should probably do a deep inspection of your beliefs and stop denying the actual, practical experience of many people who are responding to you with real world experience. Oh, but it does when it has a hardware memory compression engine. The very different GPU design also means it can use less or more memory in different situations.
Yes, “a single frame of 16 bit 8K RAW” will be the same size expanded. And there are other ways an OS can use to keep memory usage lower given a different CPU architecture Ooooh good point – haven’t actually heard of newest NVME stuff before. The obvious observation here is that the fab yields for high memory apple silicone must not be all that great, which is why they’re mostly shipping 8 and 16gb versions.
And even then it’s barely one order of magnitude. You were wrong, it’s ok Panzer04 8 days ago root parent next [—]. Just because the user doesn’t notice GUI problems doesn’t mean it’s not going to be a catastrophic bottleneck in any memory-intensive application. What even is “used memory” anyway?
Apparently 32GB of memory is being “used”. Do you believe I would experience noticeable performance loss if I was running 16GB of memory? Not to mention random access latency, nanos vs mics. It makes essentially no noticeable difference. Over 22GB of that is cache.
Sure some cleanroom laboratory benchmark will say the 64GB version is faster. I had a base model M1 Mac Mini and it worked great even for gaming. Obviously if you’re running VMs or editing video or doing any other memory intense workload you’re going to need more memory.
So a high end SSD is about as fast as 20 year old memory, if you ignore latency. Ah beat me to it! The idea that Mx swapping to NVME is essentially no-op from performance perspective is patently wrong. I don’t know what people are reading into my comment. The reason we need it is precisely because disk is slower and cheaper. I think people just want to argue, so they half read your comment.
Destroying the resale value of your laptop because trashing through a non-replacable SSD is not something I would really appreciate. We don’t have? The result is stunning. What relationship would that be? There’s no amount of magic to get around those facts. I’m a professional systems programmer. I agree with everything you’re saying, in principle.
I frankly don’t notice the difference between the two on any workload. This involves compiling multiple projects, running multiple docker containers locally in virtual machines, running VS Code, Slack, Chrome, and other productivity tools.
These machines frankly feel like alien fucking technology and I don’t say that lightly. I’m used to year-over-year improvements being almost unnoticeable. These machines feel like I’ve jumped ten or more years forward in performance and responsiveness. And they do so while barely generating heat.
Not only was it faster, but the room wasn’t even perceptibly warmer than ambient. I have a gaming PC next to my work area. The fans go blazing and I start sweating just booting Windows. I barely turn the damn thing on these days. Alien technology. The RTX is a massive power hog. All that energy has to be dissipated somehow. It’s really impressive what Apple has managed to do with the M1 and M2 chips.
The problem with Apple and games is less about hardware and a lot more about software. What does the OS do if the application demands more than 8gb of memory? I have use cases in the 14gb memory range for a single threaded application.
Would the application crash since its not built to anticipate swapping? I assume you are responding to pxmpxm’s comment. Disk can have high transfer speeds but access time isn’t at all comparable to ram.
I was interested until I saw it tops out at 8gb. My environment typically needs just over 16gb. What tops out at 8gb by the way?
The previous gen Air gos up to 16Gb, and this gen’s goes up to 24Gb. Their website presentation tops out at 8. If I go to their store website it shows me only two options: – 8 core, 8 core gpu, 8gb, – 8 core, 10 core gpu, 8gb, No indication whatsoever that this 8gb is not fixed. Nor is the storage fixed. But the only way to find out is to try and buy it, at which point I can just turn the first model into the second or something else entirely. Also, none of the presented options is anywhere close in price to the top spec model.
I thought apple was supposed to be good at UX? Schiendelman 8 days ago root parent next [—]. Not in German, no. And even then, how would you know that ram is confugurable?
It’s very obvious in the next screen that you can configure RAM. That is the whole point and I said that already If you look through this thread you see quite a few peopke thinking you can only get 8gb of ram because the only two models shown feature 8gb and no text next to that indicating otherwise. Only if you think that apple might be lying, you go to the next page and see that they offer more than 8.
No, scroll down a lot and then it is hidden in the fluff text. Great, doesn’t change that it is missing in the central place people actually look at. All the “well technically you can find out by jumping through these hoops” does not change that this is bad UX. I never said it was. Since “software has only been getting more and more complex and bloated over the last 10 years” it should be comparable, right? I don’t understand the point you are trying to make here. These tasks are all limited by available RAM and the available RAM has not significantly increased since my point.
I’ve handled all of these. With no issue. If you mean “simultaneously” thankfully I don’t edit 8K video simultaneously with programming and recoding music. I don’t know anyone who does either. My point is rather, “16GB in , 16GB in , no difference”.
And I say: try doing any of those things on your machine and a 16GB M1, and you’ll immediately see the difference. I didn’t say there is “no difference” between these machines, that’s ridiculous.
My point is that Apples system-on-a-chip architecture, while giving big performance and efficiency gains, comes with a trade-off. That trade off is availability and pricing of RAM configurations. That 8GB or 16 works for you is great, but it doesn’t work for every use case. It’s a phenomenal machine. With 8gb? All it took was teams, slack, chrome, MS word, docker vm with default config and 2 1G VMs invirtualbox reply.
The M1 machines have hardware compression on data going into memory. It goes very very far. Waityou’re using VirtualBox on a Mac with an M1 chip? I didn’t think that was possible and if it is, I’ll be grateful if you can tell me how. Where did the 8GB number come from? The discussion was about 16GB. I have an M1 macbook air and it’s flipping fast with insane battery life. Generally won’t be swapping that often I would think, but besides the point because swap with SSDs that are as good as the ones in MBs isn’t a big performance hit like it used to be.
Swap also doesn’t degrade SSD lifetimes like it used to. Who cares what the hardware is as long as it responds quickly to my commands? It does not help to oversimplify things. The problem I have is that a 16GB machine from 10 years ago will still work better for certain tasks than an 8GB machine today. Memory capacity is still a fundamental bottleneck for certain workloads even with faster storage, processing, etc. And desktop software is generally getting more memory intensive rather than less.
The fact that just running a web browser and vscode already almost fills the entire memory is a disgrace. I love the device, but how little effort they put into optimizing their memory use and swap, makes it less than perfect.
Ya but neither have really mattered in terms of speed for years for most people. I’m still stick at gb over here and I have to be pretty picky about what stays on. Unless you want to run VMs. Then more RAM is generally more better. While your second statement is probably true, do you actually disagree that 16 gigs of RAM on an M1 gets you much better performance than 16 gigs on an Intel Mac? Isn’t it the same DDR4x in either? Computers are not just the sum of their hardware specs.
It’s a lot faster and of higher quality now. Those numbers do not reflect the speed of the ram, the speed of the memory, the quality of the screen, or the performance of the CPU reply. Also, software bloat means that the old macbook can’t do shit with today’s software. Currently using a macbook pro, with a gb ssd, and 16gb sticks. These days its not hard to call upon compute from the heavens priced by the second should you need more horsepower.
LibreOffice and Firefox for web browsing, mostly. Anything more than that and it chokes. Too many tabs, it chokes. Too many software updates, woo boy does she choke. That poor machine! A great performance boost. Old OS but it still works well for me. Sure it can reply. Ya but it’s the same amount. Wew my files load marginally faster, but I can only have 5 of them for the same money that I used to be able to have That’s like telling someone who can’t get a new van with similar features for the same price to instead get a one wheel reply.
It really doesn’t matter what the underlying hardware is. If it responds to your input quicker, then it’s a better product remember how slow it was to fill that memory in the first place and then save your changes to disk? That’s not to forget the improvements in network speeds, the screen, the speakers, the battery life, the webcam, etc.
I actually disagree, but I take your point. A better product needs to make a real difference for the price. The likelihood I’d ever see those gains, compared to the likelihood I’d be able to use more storage, is wildly different.
The product as a whole is better, but the individual upgrades you’d be absolutely limited by cost much more than they should. That’s just a bit ridiculous. If I did have endless money, or my regular work was heavily IO bound, then it wouldn’t change anything, except I’d be much more willing to ignore how much it costs. In other words, they’re made with parts from best-of-breed computing devices, superior to janky-ass PC parts : reply.
Or any SIMD operations, for that matter. Yeah, only – the processor has several times more transistors and cores, – plus several special purposes devices for encoding video, AI tasks, and so on – the video performance is several times faster – the battery lasts 4 times as much, – the RAM is several times faster, – the SSD is x faster, – the display has twice the resolution and extremelly improved brightness and color rendition Idk, laptops look pretty similar to laptops in Both were slow too.
I never complained about the speed or battery life of the machine, so your mocking tone is unjustified. Today even web browsers running typical web pages consume gigabytes of RAM. I see your point. Essentially, you get a fast computer for contemporary, real world use, for the same price as 10 years ago. Together with the improved software capabilities, I think the overall “experience” is “better” and you get more bang for buck. How is 8gb of ram equivocal to 16gb of ram? You can hold fewer things in memory.
Certain programs respond to that by crashing to desktop. Frankly the speed of memory is a lot less relevant to most users compared to how much crap you can shovel into memory and not start to see programs crash to desktop. An MBP that’s faster than any PC laptop of equivalent form factor, with a longer battery life, should be well worth the scratch.
Historically, if you compare pre-M1 Macs to equivalent PCs, they were very price competitive. There are no equivalents to Apple Silicon Macs. Which other has gotten dramatically cheaper in that time. I see lenovo T-, P- series, dell precision, HP elitebook essentially same price. Those two numbers are the same reply. Other bigger chargers are a 2 month wait. Looks like Apple is still suffering from supply chain issues.
Would recommend over buying the Apple option for 2x the price. Is this about the new MacBook Air? I’m in favor of them bringing magsafe back, but if and only if it also charges via USB-C cables as well.
There is absolutely zero doubt, and as others mentioned, it is the same on the 14″ and 16″. Yup, one of the coolest parts of this gen. Either or. If that means they ship with something like a 45W that’s just cruel. I bet the charge merely maintains when the computer is under load. That keeps up with the demand even running Photoshop, Minecraft, Xcode, etc.
I do the same thing with my Intel MBP. It’s nice being able to go on trips with only your phone charger. You can choose from either at no additional charge. This is surprising! Thought they would have found a way to extract more money from people. Charges fine over a long time. I bet my laptop runs hotter than this new MBA. I had one of the last intel mbas and whatever charger they shipped with that computer was downright anemic.
I put the computer under load with a game and the charge actually was trickling down with the thing plugged in and the cpu throttling. Kognito 8 days ago parent prev next [—]. Shanghai lockdowns are easing now so we should see supply come back online soon. Is there a third-party charger that can deliver that wattage? It does charge everything I have plugged it into, but they might all be falling back to 5V1A.
The back text could also just not be telling the truth. I’ve used them to good success. Sure, Anker sells some reply.
Never measured it but this can charge my Razor Blade at what appears to be w. Anker Nano II is tiny and does 65 watts. I ran my i9 MBP on the single port and it regularly drew 90W. I have a Ugreen 4-port GaN charger 3 usb-c, 1 usb-a that’s able to provide 90w if you only use the top usb-c port. It’s cheaper than the 96w charger that came with my Macbook. That’s the one thing that’s kind of gimped it for me—if I could get more WiFi bandwidth, especially with the ProRes decoding built into the M2, I might be able to edit 4K video over my network wirelessly for the first time.
Would be amazing. To be clear, I still think the M1 Air was the best portable laptop Apple made since the 11″ Air before it was discontinued. I just think it being so ‘wireless-first’, it should have the best wireless speed possible. Good lord, to think of not that many years ago still needing to be firmly attached to an array of spinning rust to get performance for that. Now, we want to nearly can do it wirelessly. Just another set of gear adding to the pile of boat anchors I’ve been collecting reply.
The portability was nice but I’d never go back to a computer that small. Too cramped, too little screen real estate, too small a battery. It doesn’t surprise me that 11″ laptops are rare these days. I’ve gone back and forth over the years. Part of me would like a smaller system for travel but 1.
I always end up wondering if the tradeoff is worth it given how relatively small and light 13″ laptops can be and 2. I probably will never again travel to the degree I was doing it at peak. A modern 13″ laptop with narrow bezels is pretty much the same size as the old 11″ laptops with huge bezels. This; the 11″ had massive bezels, comparatively.
That was the only real downside IMO. But the compact footprint was amazing for travel. I plugged it into my dock if I was at the desk. I used four generations of the MBA, including the 11″ From the specs: I mean, those specs seem to say that it doesn’t support Wi-Fi 6E. I edited the comment after noticing my error, no? It is not updated for the new models yet. Basically what every other vendor at the market offers. Granted, many APs do not support more than 2×2, but there are models on the market that do, and those who care about these things had a choice.
Now, it is join the averages. They could add it after the fact. The Mac Mini M1 launched with only a regular Ethernet port. I’ve been looking for replacement home networking gear the last few days – I still don’t understand Wifi 6 vs 6E, but mostly what I wanted to say was when the Wifi4,5,.. I was really trying to distinguish devices using separate 6ghz backplane, and that was annoyingly opaque to me as a person who writes does code but aggressively avoids anything networking 😀 reply.
E implies the ability to use additional channels at the 6 GHz frequencies. With 5 GHz there are some problems, almost everyone uses the lower ones, leading to congestion and ignoring the upper ones due to DFS radar detection; people are not fond of their wifi randomly not working. And contrary to yours opinion, I consider that both 4 -n and 5 -ac brought very nice things like support for new frequencies, wider channels or multiple streams.
You miss understand – I thought the naming change from Oh, that’s how you meant it. Sorry for misunderstanding. Yes, the new naming scheme is way more understandable for normal users.
If you do a compare against the original M1 MacBook Air, they don’t say anything about the network is different.
It just says ” Same for the MacBook Pro M2. I have an M1 Pro 14″ and ethernet is literally x faster than Wi-Fi using speed tests. What do you use for an ethernet adapter? I can hardly tell the difference with a RT adapter, then the increase in CPU usage renders it largely pointless.
I hoped the notch would be just an experiment and Apple would get rid of it the next iteration. It seems I was wrong. For people undecided because of the notch, it might not look as clean on photographs but in practice, macOS knows that it’s there and they did a good job in order to avoid displaying anything behind it. It’s empty space, and the whole row goes completely black in most fullscreen cases too as the screen is BELOW the menu bar. You forget it as easily as you forget that you have a nose right in the middle of your vision.
I have a quest 2 that I burned sunspots into that resulted in blotches of pixels stuck on yellow. I use my headset for hours at a time and never notice them unless brought to an all black loading screen, and even then it’s not a guarantee. The brain is crazy good at filling in blindspots. I’m currently sitting at my notchless-MBP noting how there is not a single thing in the middle of my menu bar and there never has been. I can’t think of a single reason I wouldn’t want a notch in exchange for smaller bezels.
Especially given the aspect ratio of a Mac is taller such that it doesn’t interrupt typical video or photo content reply. WesolyKubeczek 8 days ago root parent next [—]. Somehow Dell XPS can do thin bezels without having to resort to a notch. My XPS not a brand new one, not sure if this has changed has a really weird webcam location to get the thin bezel, it’s right next to they keyboard There are always tradeoffs, and I find the notch to be a trade-off with no real loss.
WesolyKubeczek 7 days ago root parent next [—]. I also need to mention that this thing is light. Lighter than an iPad pro, lighter than any MBAir. Fanless still beats no notch. I have a launch day MBP16″ and I haven’t noticed the notch a single day so far.
I just have more screen space now. Does it really bother you in your day to day? I do not have an M1 laptop, so I cannot answer your question. It really does disappear after a little while reply. The notch doesn’t get in the way in daily use as much as it would seem. Look at it this way: without the notch, that area would’ve been useless black glass.
But with the notch, the menu bar doesn’t eat into the continuous part of the screen yet remains fully functional, effectively giving you more usable screen area.
I’ve read all the arguments pro-notch, that you won’t notice, and that it doesn’t take up screen real estate, and so on. But still, the design compromise bothers me; hiding a camera such that the aesthetic geometry isn’t distorted feels wrong and fake, and something not here to stay for long, just as you say. Why not implement a mechanical flip-out camera holder?
Helps with perceived big brother effect, too. Btw, is the mandatory touch bar thingy back? That would be a step back in my book. It is not. This pushes menu and status bars up into the bezel area at the top of your laptop’s lid, leaving more room in the primary 16×10 display area for apps and things. It’s free real estate, why not have menus go up there? Oh my god, that midnight colour. I just bought an M1 and knew this would be coming soon.
I have a friend who as of was still running her black plastic MacBook for music production. Probably still is. Every time I saw it I felt a little pain — why did I buy the white one?
Which turned half yellow with time. I guess it made it easier to give away when it got too slow for coding. Otherwise, I love it, even though it crashes every time it goes to sleep on an external monitor and Apple’s in-house software makes me root for Asahi every day. But it does look a little bland. The midnight is gorgeous indeed.
I’m also very tempted by the whole package. Ugh, but it’s not on the pros. Here’s hoping the next update to any of the pros have it. Yes, yikes.. Was forced to get an M1 Air for a trip just last week. This smarts.. But the M1 already blew me away, so I think I’ll hang onto it reply. You can still return it reply. There are more ports on the new MBA!
KVFinn 8 days ago parent next [—].
MacBook Pro inch and MacBook Pro inch – Apple.how much ram do i need for logic pro x – Li Creative
What’s new New posts New resources Latest activity. Resources Latest reviews Search resources. Log in Register. Http://replace.me/25938.txt titles only.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. How Do I delete delete existing data, pools and datasets. Thread starter csearle Start date Feb 24, Joined Jan 18, Messages Just as the tittle says im a noob looking to start 16gb vs 32gb ram logic pro x free scratch with existing set up with drives and pools and datasets.
What’s the best possible course of action. Basil Hendroff Wizard. Joined Jan 4, 16gb vs 32gb ram logic pro x free 1, JOduMonT Dabbler. Joined Jan 27, Messages Last edited: Oct 6, Joined Jan 1, Messages 6, Ссылка на страницу were nearly there Thank you I eventually figured it out You must log in or register to reply here. Similar threads N. Replies 16 Views 3K. May 19, mav.
Locked Best course of action with additiobal drives. Replies 20 Views 2K. Aug 12, david kennedy. Can’t delete a sparsebundle. Phil Demand Jan 17, Storage. Replies 8 Views 2K. Apr 28, tdscrna. Locked – how can I recover deleted data, after zfs destroy -r. HowCast Nov 18, Storage. Replies 2 Views Nov 19, HowCast. Locked datasets vs volumes. Randall Roth Nov 6, Storage. Replies 1 Views Nov 6, Randall Roth.